I once saw someone with a front plate on his car that read “Black Jew.” I can only recall thinking: I’m glad I’m not him. For anyone to be taken in by this “real” Israelite or “real” Jew business — this is only a sign of spiritual rootlessness. The Jews themselves probably love hearing all this claptrap about “who is the real Jew”? I know there are extant factions who — because of their inability to give up their Hebrew-Bible-Jew-worship — brow beat everyone in earshot about how they (or “Aryans”) are the real Israelites. How are these people any different than the Black Israelites? All are tools of the Jew. Alfred Rosenberg said this: “[The Jewish lie] is the worst enemy of the Nordic race. Whoever abandons himself to it unchecked, perishes inwardly. He also separates himself voluntarily outwardly from the Germanic environment. He will by necessity be associated with characterless bastards and Jews.”

Egypt’s former president might be right: “the Jew left Africa black and came back white.” I say this in my essay “Misdirections” from Myth and Sun: “There is one mysterious exception to the rule of races that became a rule itself: Jewry. The Jew’s origins are in the Brown races. Because of Jewry’s peculiar self-love and disdain of other peoples, it has been booted from land to land, with no indigenous folk wanting it around once its dominant paradoxicality becomes known; hence, nomadism, or internationalism, is fundamental to Jewish character. But Jewry is distinct from the Brown races — hence its removal from other Brown societies; it is a subset of the Brown peoples that has mixed with the White. This mixing undoubtedly occurred in both Greece and Rome, preceding and precipitating the demise of each.”

There is much more said about this in the essay and my books. Perhaps key to this passage is the Jew and Whites mixing. I reiterate something from a prior answer: Would a strong, healthy people ever let things get this far gone, this out of control, this existentially critical?

The day Whites can self-reflect in any measure, even moderately so, will be a fine day. Until this occurs, I write for those yet unborn.

11) I’d like to ask you about your opinions of Mussolini and fascism. National Socialism and fascism are often lumped into the same boat, but they are very different. Can you tell your thoughts on this?

Furthermore, I recently learned of an important book called ‘Story of a Year: The Time of the Carrot and the Stick’ which is a compilation of newspaper articles written by Mussolini from June to July 1944. This was of course during his exile, in the Italian Social Republic. In his final writing we get to see a different side to the Duce which isn’t revealed in his book. Another fascinating glimpse of Mussolini is from the memoirs of the extraordinary Otto Skorzeny, who met with Mussolini during this time and had long conversations with him. Now to my point. Mussolini and Italy generally do not receive much respect from National Socialists and historians in general. True, the Italian armed forces were found to be antiquated and not up to par with their German allies, but people tend to forget, or simply do not know, that Mussolini was an early inspiration to Adolf Hitler and National Socialists all over the world, especially in the 1920s. In his march on Rome, he achieved what all the other leaders had only dreamed. He told Skorzeny that if he could go back he would have abolished the king and the royalty in Italy. In 1938, when Germany sought the famed Anschluss in Austria, much hinged on Mussolini’s reaction. Mussolini had supported Austria’s nationalist leader, Dollfuss, and had financially backed his regime (The Fatherland Front) for some years.

Mussolini chose to back Adolf Hitler and Germany, rightfully so.

Italy gave 300,000 troops to the Eastern Front, with 30,000 dead and another 54,000 thrown into communist death camps. But despite the ice and horrors of the Russian front, the Italians fought beside Germany all the way to Stalingrad. And history will never forget the utter courage and ability of the Italian frogmen of the Decima Flottiglia MAS, who humiliated Britain on the ocean battlefield in big ways.

One of the most disgusting pictures I’ve ever came across is the murder of Mussolini and his comrades. It shows the animal barbarity of our enemies and I’m certain one day he will be avenged. I’m very interested to hear your thoughts on all of this!

That Fascism and National Socialism are, as you say, lumped together speaks to (1) the little effort so many put into understanding either, and (2) the success of modern academia and media in lulling the masses into unthinking compliance. Fascism was a political concept, and in this way, a material concept; it did little to establish or revitalize Myth. Fascism was a fine concept and had remarkable intentions, but it lacked the scope and spirituality of National Socialism — this is the case because National Socialism had Adolf Hitler. Mussolini was a man; Hitler was the embodiment of an entire folk’s will; one had bravado, the other had gravity. You mention the inspirational and courageous aspects of Fascism — I agree with you. Hitler’s 1923 putsch was inspired by Mussolini’s 1922 March on Rome. And we would be foolish to discount the sacrifices of the many great Fascist heroes who fought on the side of the Hitlerian Idea. Early inspiration, however, gave way to later deference; political momentum perhaps made Mussolini significant for longer than Hitler would have liked — Hitler, after all, had a mission and knew it. No one is born a teacher, and I think the case of Hitler and Mussolini is not so much a case of “the student becomes the teacher” as it is the remarkable instance of “the student becomes God.”

It serves the interests of the intellectual class to lump Fascism and National Socialism together. If they are more or less the same, well, then case closed; no further inquiry necessary. The intellectual class doesn’t want anyone to know the depth and mystery of the Hitlerian Idea. Why would Satan want you to know God? When one begins to know the depth and mystery of the Idea, then practical application follows. This is what the intellectual class, or the ruling elite, wants to avoid. Fortunately for them, practical application is just what the “right” instinctively avoids like the plague. Of course, the intellectual class also lumps the two together because such “intellectuals” are almost entirely liberalists; excepting maybe the boneheaded “right,” perhaps no other intellectual orientation thinks less or is more narrow minded than liberalists.

Story of a Year describes Mussolini’s struggle with subversion and betrayal. That Hitler had to contend with the same says much about modernity. Savitri Devi and Miguel Serrano magisterially discuss this situation in many of their books; I discuss it in my books as well.

Yes, in the end, Mussolini and others were savagely murdered by satanic Marxists. We should expect nothing less from them; Marxists are the most hateful and destructive people propagating the most hateful and destructive ideology. Giovanni Gentile, “Fascism’s philosopher,” was also murdered by a Marxist. He was a fine thinker who did much to create a spiritual grounding for Fascism; while he succeeded to some extent, we can see the stark differences between Fascism and National Socialism when we compare his work to some of the major ideologues of the Hitlerian Idea. Nevertheless, we honor the memory of heroic Fascists.

[Above: Story of a Year: The Time of the Carrot and the Stick.]

12) I assume you’ve watched the Léon Degrelle 1974 speech 'We Dreamed Of Something Marvelous’? I think it is probably one of the greatest postwar speeches ever given. The hair stands up on the back of my neck and I get chills listening to it. When I see the men and women of this glorious past I can’t help but look around me and see something is very much missing in today’s people. Maybe it is the almost eighty years of mind-rotting entertainment and endless propaganda that has steadily been shoved down their throats? Or the zillions of chemicals and pollutants that pass through their bodies. The relatively easy life living on the laurels and hard work of their ancestors…

Degrelle was a wonder. There are many moving and harrowing war memoirs that have been published, but Degrelle’s account of his time on the Eastern Front is among the best. He fought for his fellow Aryans to the end.

What he and so many others see and have seen is what has been foretold from the beginning. The reason we see prophecy in so many ancient texts is because it is in us — we who are born in this darkest of ages — to intimately know the fate that stands at the end of time. As we approach this end, we necessarily fulfill the steps to reach it. If our end is complete devastation, which it is, then all life walks the path that brings this end nearer. In Myth and Sun I write, “our time is the end time and all of history is a record of our decline, Götterdämmerung.” I write this to celebrate Nietzsche. 

In Hitlerism I write, “if one falls from the path, one was never on the path and never would have been; there is only success or failure in this existential combat of the Cosmic Struggle. Those who ‘don’t make it’ were lost from the beginning, and they are never worth another’s time. If another ‘makes it’ along the true path, this one would have made it regardless of another’s intervention. In short, help those only willing and able to help themselves; no one else is viable.” How does one determine whether one is viable or not? Again, I think self-reflection is the key. The one who succeeds in fulfilling his or her Aryanism will succeed no matter what; that is, they have within the instinct to act rightly — this is why they are Aryan. They are not biological “gifts” to the world; they are spiritual fighters. The Cosmic Struggle doesn’t give a damn about their skin color. A common refrain in my work is, Race is not everything, but it is the beginning of everything. This notion is Hitlerian. The unfit Whites that Hitler’s Reich would’ve finally exorcised from society now run rampant today making a mockery of all things Hitlerist; these melanin monkeys are boon companions for the Jew. Without character, race is meaningless. Few on the “right” have any character worth mentioning. But this is the essence of the Kali-Yuga.

For the few Aryans remaining, what each one’s individual struggle looks like is between them and God. Kierkegaard was a Germanic thinker. Does this mean he shunned work that wasn’t racially Germanic? No. One of his most profound texts is Fear and Trembling, a title he drew from Philippians 2:12: Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. What does this mean if not self-reflection? If you are good, you will find the way — because you are good. If you don’t know where to start, or your liberal indoctrination has narrowed your mind to a pinpoint, you’re simply no good, and your fate is sealed.

13) People often lament ‘If only Adolf Hitler would have done this or that differently… if only he had been more vicious, more brutal, merciless…’ But they don’t understand Adolf Hitler at all. But don’t get me wrong, I think all of us have occasionally yearned for a more brutal Adolf Hitler. One that would have not let his enemies leave Dunkirk alive. One that would have approved the use of the atom bomb. One that would have matched the Allies in their terrible and ruthless tactics. But, that is not the Adolf Hitler that we so deeply love. That is not the ‘too much Sun and not enough Lightning’ which Savitri so beautifully taught us. We love Adolf Hitler because of his impeccably honorable and magical goodness. We love him and trust him and try to follow his example. If ever I’ve had a question in life I always consider, what would Adolf Hitler think? Your thoughts?

Adolf Hitler did everything precisely as was necessary to secure the Myth, to glorify the Sun. If one doesn’t see this now, one will either come to see it — or one will not.

Judeo-materialists can debate about the merits of Hitler’s actions. Such people fit nicely into modernity.

In Hitler Avatara I write, “In the case of Hitler’s nature, we must believe or be offended by the Führer’s fundamental goodness and his appearance as God; in the case of Hitler’s alleged actions, we must believe or be offended by both the revisions and allegations concerning Adolf Hitler, and by the Führer’s compulsion to do what’s demanded by divine restoration…” This statement occurs in a larger discussion of “offense” and faith, and the entanglement of the two. I encourage readers to read the full text. For our purposes here, I can simply say that I have no use for the material-minded detractors; surely there’s a Jewish podcaster that better suits their taste.

[Above: Savitri Devi and Miguel Serrano.]

14) As a young teenager I discovered the truth, luckily meeting the ‘right crowd’ one summer vacation lost in time. It was an absolute flood of information. I was told pretty much everything I had been taught previously was wrong. I didn’t just believe everything I was told immediately, no I needed time and proof. We got into many spirited conversations about what was a lie and what was the truth. I slowly began to open my eyes to this new world -- blinders off! But it wasn’t until I read some of the booklets of Dr. William Pierce from the National Alliance that I really began to see. It was like an avalanche of truth. I read his books and tuned into his radio show. He had a booklet called ‘Who Rules America’ that really opened my eyes. All of the information was rather unbelievable at first. But he always said ‘don’t take my word for it, find out for yourself’. Thus began a journey that continues till this day.

My question to you is do you know of this great man? If so, when did you discover him? How important was he in your search for truth? I think one day men will erect great statues of him. Are there any other modern men who have inspired you?

I know of him; but neither he nor any other American played a role in my intellectual development. I simply haven’t read them; though I do recall hearing a Pierce radio message here or there later in my search. In fact, I don’t recall hearing Pierce say anything I disagreed with; and he was quite impassioned. I don’t mean to diminish his or other American fighters’ thought or struggle. I can only say that my inspirations came from elsewhere.

You ask about “modern men.” If this means people living today, there are none from whom I draw inspiration. Now, if by “modern” you mean anyone born since the fall of Constantinople in 1453, then, yes, I am inspired by several.

Those thinkers I hold most dear are Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Savitri Devi, and Miguel Serrano. This is elite company; and it would be difficult for anyone to measure up to their standard. Of these, if I were forced to choose one, I would probably keep hold of Nietzsche. He’s not only one of the most brilliant thinkers I’ve encountered, he’s a prophet — and this is not to mention his unmatched writing style. I cite Nietzsche more than anyone else in my work. Beyond more strictly philosophical types, my greatest influences come from Hitlerist memoirs: Hans-Ulrich Rudel, Léon Degrelle, Hans Roth, Otto Skorzeny, Sepp de Giampietro, etc. 

More personally, I’m influenced by the Germanic blood in my veins. I’m grateful for my family who never had a foul word to say about Adolf Hitler. I honor the memory of my kinsmen who fought for the Hitlerian Idea in the SS.

15) I’m curious to know what sort of music interests you? My website used to focus on underground black/death metal, but I’m not sure if you know what this is? But my musical tastes are quite eclectic. Have you ever heard ‘skinhead’ music (sometimes called ‘RAC’ or Rock Against Communism)? Do you know of Ian Stuart and his band Skrewdriver? But thinking about Ian Stuart, I think of his opus, ‘The Snow Fell’ and the beautiful rendition of the song done by the artist Saga.

Out of black metal grew ‘National Socialist Black Metal’ and the spirit of RAC is found in nearly all styles of music now. I’d like to ask you what you think of skinheads? Have you ever seen the movie Romper Stomper? It’s an excellent film which accidentally shows our plight in a very real way. I see the skinhead culture as very much a defiant rebellion against the Jewish world order. Often times they were young, poor, from broken homes, with little except for each other. But like so many, they looked back to a better time, a time that cared about them, a time that they could call home. Far away from the dirty streets of ‘democracy’. The ‘melting pot’ of madness and desegregation at the end of a bayonet. The prison world that we know so well, the nightmare of now.

I have a lot of sympathy for these kids in this age of Kali Yuga, who have to ‘grow into this rotten garden’. What are your thoughts on all of this?

Lamentably, I have little comment to make here. I’m unfamiliar with most of what you mention. But, if they are honorable, loyal, and decent people, I hope they had/have success.

For music generally, I enjoy depth and melody, regardless of genre. Beethoven, Chopin, and Bach are nearly unapproachable. Wagner had some incredibly powerful (non-operatic) music, but I’m not a fan of opera. If I had to pick a more recent band, it would be Led Zeppelin; musically they had no peer.

[Above: Ian Stuart and Saga.]

16) One thing I’ve always thought about is ‘What the hell would the men of the Third Reich think about us today?’ Would they think we are freaks and laugh at us? Would they feel sorry for us? What would they think of the skinhead band Landser’s opus ‘Rudolf Hess’? Would they be proud of us, for essentially picking up a million shattered pieces of them that the victors couldn’t destroy? For finding them in near total darkness, and for what our etiquette and decorum lack our iron devotion and love deliver. We have found a magical beauty in their utter ruins. They thought they could kill Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, but their useless bombs merely spread it all over the world.

What would Adolf Hitler think of us, Martin? I can’t help but know in my heart he would be proud of us, despite all the mistakes and all the darkness. I remember him in the bunker, brave and true till the last, but having pity for the ones left behind. Us.

“They thought they could kill Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, but their useless bombs merely spread it all over the world.” That’s a fine way to put it; and they deserve nothing less.

I can’t help but think of the Goebbels family, their last hours in the bunker. For dedicated parents (perfect, no; but dedicated) to end the lives of their six children, and then to end their own lives… What can one say? Those were desperate times; unprecedented times. What terrible tragedy. “What is done out of love always takes place beyond good and evil,” as Nietzsche so perfectly put it. 

So much of what happened then was done out of love, which is precisely why it’s always portrayed as being “absolute evil.” The victors want nothing less than to continue their upturning of all reality; they also want to bastardize and pervert any type of spiritual living. Why else, for instance, do we see the satanic Pope espousing the most progressive of causes? One must keep the sheep in proper pasture! The point is to debase “spirituality” to oblivion — i.e., the point is that people live purely materially. Material-minded people are empty urns waiting to be filled with the ashes of all the vile burnt offerings made to Satan-Jehovah.

The world didn’t end in 1945. There was still much for which to fight, live, and die. Aryans will always recognize the good in Aryans, regardless of era. Gott mit uns.

17) Regarding Miguel Serrano, a lot of people are turned off when they read his works upon the mention of Lucifer. They immediately think "SATAN!", but like so many pagan deities the Christians turned them into devils. Pan, for example, became a devil because he had horns, even though he was the farthest thing from a demon a god could be. Easter is derived from 'Eostre', a goddess of fertility and spring and the day itself a pagan holiday, the Christians just turned this into the day Jesus was resurrected. Even our days still bear the names of the old gods -- Wednesday = Wotan's Day, Thursday = Thor's Day and so on. But the name Lucifer came to represent the Devil himself. Can you explain to us what you know about this deity and how it came to represent 'Satan'?

No one ever has to agree with every last word another has written or thought. If I hold Nietzsche in the highest esteem, does that mean I slavishly follow everything he says? Of course not. Does it mean I reject what he says where we have friction just to be rancorous? No. Any strong individual of personality will make an effort to engage with the ideas one confronts. There are two types of people who reject — totally and immediately — ideas that cause them discomfort: (1) narrow-minded liberalists (and under this umbrella term we can shelter all Jew-allies); and (2) cowardly sheep who are useless to any cause.

The limit to these “ideas that cause discomfort” is the Aryan litmus test: Is it honorable? Is it loyal (to Aryanism, or all things Aryan)? Is it decent? Is it courageous? Is it creative? This is not an imposed limit, but a natural one. It’s not a limit to a tree to have leaves, roots, and bark. Characteristics define the object. This is all said to bar the way to the truly depraved and un-Aryan types who get excited when they hear in what I said above “reject nothing that causes discomfort” — this is not what I said. It’s unfortunate we even have to discuss this, but, statistically speaking, some debased Judeo-bot will read this at some point and I want him to know his depravity is never welcome; I want him to know he is broken, that he has nothing of any value, and no one wants him around. He has or undoubtedly will find a home with the satanic Marxists.

Lucifer is not Satan. Satan is Jehovah, the Jewish “god.” Lucifer is the Lichtbringer, the light bringer; Satan is the murderous enslaver who aims to smother the light. Light comes from the sun; the sign of the sun is the Swastika. The same hatred oriented toward “Lucifer” is oriented toward the Swastika. This is no accident. The entire purpose of Judeo-Christianity was and is to insinuate itself into European lifeways to revaluate all values — good becomes bad, left becomes right, etc. That Lucifer, which is only a symbol for what was once European (or the old values), was turned into the embodiment of “evil” is the purpose of Jewish revaluation. 

What adds to the confusion today is all the deliberate (or not-so-deliberate) conflation of Satan and Lucifer. Oftentimes, many people, witting or not, say “Lucifer” when they mean “Satan.” I don’t know if it’s worth anyone’s time to unpack the nonsense here. Suffice it to say that (1) if someone is evil, they are in league with Satan-Jehovah, and (2) Aryans are on the side of Light, Jews and their allies are on the side of satanic darkness.

This topic comes up infrequently in my writing, but it does come up — just because it has to. I wish this were something we didn’t have to discuss, but we are up against millennia of Jewish indoctrination. Undoubtedly, some small mind out there will interpret all this to mean, “Oh, so we worship Lucifer!” No — no one has said that. These are all symbols. The story is not the symbols; the story is the substance behind the symbols. The substance is Light and Dark, Aryan and Jew. Don’t worship a symbol — revere the Light! Go be creative, exercise your divine will with honor and loyalty — failure to do this means you were never Aryan at all.

[Above: 'Lucifer' by the German artist Fidus. Fidus was a member of the NSDAP and even did works of Adolf Hitler.]

18) Okay, let's go off the rails a bit and let me ask you a few hypothetical questions. First, something most of us have dreamed of: if you could go back in time and had five minutes with Adolf Hitler, in the spring of 1939, what would you tell him? Or ask him? You could tell him about the arch traitor Canaris. Or the despicable Paulus. Information about Kursk, the Ardennes Offensive, Dunkirk, etc. Of course, I'm asking you to throw aside the idea that everything happened as it was supposed to be according to fate, etc.

I would suggest to Hitler that he send his most loyal friend and ally into the compromised heart of the “Aryan land with the Jewish soul,” Britain, in May of 1941 — vying for peace, but knowing only demise waits in return. I will tell him what he already knows: that the meaning of all reality rests in the fulfillment of this sacrifice.

Every Aryan has had this encounter with Hitler; and we will have it again.

19) Your thoughts on General Patton's untimely death? There is a lot of evidence that has come to light that he was murdered. I'm sure you heard of the rather explosive quotes from the letters he wrote home to his wife? That he would run for president after the war, that the USA was fighting the wrong enemy, the extremely anti-Jew sentiments... Did you also know that he thought that if the Germans had successfully reached Antwerp during the Ardennes Offensive, that they would have cut the Allied armies in two, breaking its supply lines, and carrying the war into 1946. He also commented that if this were to happen that the American people would have demanded an end to the war. American propaganda called this  operation 'The Battle of the Bulge', but in fact it was nearly successful, and resulted in extremely high Allied casualties. I've read that the morgue freezers in France were overflowing with Allied dead... your thoughts on all of this?

Patton was likely murdered by the satanic forces that occupied (and continue to occupy) his own government. Another rift, less well known but not long after this, is worth researching as well: Why did Truman essentially fire MacArthur during the Korean War?

There’s much to reflect on regarding the war — much sacrifice, heroism, tragedy, salvation. There are many poignant memoirs available, if one looks beyond what’s for sale or loan at the local Marxist bookstore or library.

My ode to what was is captured in my essay “Against All Odds” (Myth and Sun).

20) Beyond the well-known names like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Heinrich Himmler and Hermann Göring, etc. who are your favorites and why?

Like so many of that era, Jochen Peiper was done a great disservice, demonized as he was for the Allied Myth of Malmedy (i.e., the lies of Malmedy). It’s important for people to know the lies the Judeo-Allies coaxed and propagated. A few books might describe the lie, but I haven’t found one better than Leo Kessler’s (Charles Whiting’s) SS Peiper. Kessler was definitely not sympathetic to Peiper or Germany, but he was compelled to tell the truth of the Malmedy event. Kessler establishes what any sensible person would see as a definitive case against the Allied lies. He also relates what happened to Peiper years after the war and subsequent trial. For those who don’t know his postwar story, I won’t detail it here; but it is an all-too-familiar one.

21) Lastly, any future books you are working on or planning? Anywhere on the web where we can read any of your writings? Your last words to the waiting world...?

Thank you for this chance to talk with you and, by extension, the readers of the wide world. I hope that many who made it this far are good and honorable people, and I hope they inspire such traits in others.

---

Back to Interviews

---